Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

lay off Amira Hass

As’ad AbuKhalil is attacking Amira Hass here:

Amira Hass wants Egyptians to roll out the red carpet for her

“While In Cairo, I finally found out that Israel is an occupying state. This is thanks to all those people who refused to meet with an Israeli jour­nal­ist. In this way, my three-week stay in rev­o­lu­tion­ary Cairo turned into an adventure of seek bypass routes, and not without a great deal of pro­fes­sional frus­tra­tion.”  Good for you, Egyptian people. (thanks Ali)

Everyone knows that the Israeli left is feeble. Everyone knows that Zionism is hegemonic amongst Israeli Jews. We also know that the Israeli radical left gets over-promoted, and that people, espe­cially left-liberal Americans and Europeans, are quite desperate to hear rustlings of change from within Israeli society. They are not there yet. But I don’t see the point of this sort of attack. First, read Hass’s article. It’s excellent: running short of playing the ingénue, what Hass is trying to do is to show both why the dominant Egyptian anti-normalization discourse is the way it is, why it is height­ened in the current atmos­phere, as well as why in some respects it’s quite blinkered (or “dumb” as one Egyptian leftist rightly commented to me).

I have news for As’ad: we need cracks within Zionist hegemony. Big ones. They have nuclear weapons and plenty of non-nuclear weaponry, and we need forces within that society at some point who can stop it from going out with a bang. The seeds of those forces, no matter if they seem sterile at the moment, are in the Israeli radical left. Stop playing demagogue by ridi­cul­ing them. There are plenty of Israelis we can ridicule who richly deserve it.

Tech­no­rati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

11 comments to lay off Amira Hass

  • That depends on how you mean “lay off” Max…hehehe Just kidding. I would assume (hopefully not making myself an ass) that Mr. AbuKhalil is just weary of the endless accolades of some jour­nal­ists and that nothing really changes. Of course, it may not be fair taking this out on Amira Hass, but than again is any of the current debacle including Israel and the sur­round­ing regions servitude to the settler colonial state fair? After a while, even with good jour­nal­ism everyone seems like a big buffoon. Egypt does not seem ready to welcome anyone from Israel with open arms, which means that they are possibly of the same mind of Mr. AbuKhalil…

    • Max

      They are. And in the current climate, that’s under­stand­able. But the Egyptian anti-normalization extending even to Israeli anti-Zionists and radicals was never a good stance.

      • Michael T

        This is indeed a dis­gust­ing char­ac­ter­i­za­tion by AA. “Roll out the red carpet for her”?? are you kidding me?? What is most enraging about this post is that, unlike the vast majority of the Egyptian people, Asad is well aware what Amira Hass stands for:
        http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2010/06/this-is-ziohttp://angryarab.blogspot.com/2008/12/between-ham

        Yet that doesn’t stop him from com­mand­ing: “Good for you, Egyptian people.“
        Regard­less of how much we under­stand the necessity to battle Arab nor­mal­iza­tion with the Zionist regime this is in fact a green light by the high and mighty AA to spit in the face of any anti-Zionist Israeli jews as a essential part of the boycott and, in a nutshell, cursing anti-normalization activists from the other side.
        So Egyptian weariness to nor­mal­iza­tion sometimes has negative con­se­quences, it is unfor­tu­nate but an important campaign. for Mr. high and mighty AA though those are virtues and that’s what I find most disgusting.

  • anniebannie

    The “peace” process never involved the Egyptian people

  • DavidGreen

    AA is a great blogger, and without his antipathy to The White Man wouldn’t be who he is. Nev­er­the­less, he shows poor judgment in cases like this. He might be unnecc­sar­ily alien­tat­ing an audience that would be sym­pa­thetic to his critiques.

  • Jim Holstun

    Max perfectly diagnoses the biggest dumbass mistake of the peren­ni­ally dumbass left: resisting any attempt to find cracks and divisions in the camp of the enemy, even potential traitors within it.

    Where would the American ruling classes be today if they said something equally dumbass like, “Hey, why should we try to set white workers against black workers? After all, they’re all workers and objec­tively opposed to the main­te­nance of our class position!”? (Answer to rhetor­i­cal question): they would no longer be the American ruling class.

    Plus, Amira is A-OK. Given the sectarian nuthouse they live in, she and Gideon Levy are forever risking their lives to declare sol­i­dar­ity with the Palestinians.

    But AbuKhalil is absolutely right to attack the dyed-in-the-wool Zionist, Uri Avnery.

  • Michael T

    Check this out: http://mondoweiss.net/2011/03/egyptians-and-the-t
    Quite a hatchet job, quoted by the AA no less.
    Although most of the article is dedicated to beating down straw men it’s not all bad. I agree that Hass’ pitting the Anti-Normalization campaign against the Pales­tini­ans is a misguided polemic weapon at best.

  • thanks, this was a good and well argued response

  • VIVIENNE PORZSOLT

    Well said, Max and others. It is apo­lit­i­cal to attack all Israelis regard­less and any oppor­tu­nity to divide Zionists and strengthen the oppo­si­tion, no matter how miniscule and numer­i­cally weak should not be ignored.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>